Putting the “cool” into a big screen offering – and actually having it turn out to be cool – is often easier said than done. Attempts at accomplishing this feat in many instances turn out to be hokey, trite or mishandled, so it’s gratifying to see a filmmaker pull it off successfully. Such is the case in the latest work from director Steven Soderbergh and screenwriter David Koepp, an expertly structured, superbly executed spy thriller masterfully laced with suspense, wit, charm, class and a dash of deftly placed camp. This savvy, top-shelf story follows a group of high-ranking British intelligence officers caught up in a web of international intrigue in which carefully calculated financial, political, military and technological misdirections are at work at seemingly every turn. On top of that, this cadre of colleagues is made up of diverse individuals who are allegedly good friends and/or romantic partners, though such loyalties and confidences become expendable and are conveniently swept under the rug as “black bag” considerations when they get in the way of agency operations (or, in some cases, personal agendas). To complicate matters further, it’s not always clear which puppet masters are purportedly pulling their respective strings (or why), leading to a constant shuffling of the deck of priorities and the overall clarity of their missions. And, in making all of this clandestine subterfuge work, there’s the aforementioned cool factor that causes everything to seem so inherently logical, plausible, and, above all, entertaining. Think of this as a modern-day version of “The Ipcress File” (1965) (which is said to have inspired this release), combined with elements of “An Acceptable Loss” (2018), and you’ve got a good idea of what this one is all about. Of course, none of this would have been possible without the film’s generally crisp, on-point script and the fine performances turned in by its excellent ensemble, including Cate Blanchett, Naomie Harris, Pierce Brosnan, Regé-Jean Page, Tom Burke, Marisa Abela and Michael Fassbender (in a surprisingly effective role for once, a nuanced, understated portrayal in which he’s not constantly mugging for the camera, enabling him to come across like a latter-day young Michael Caine). This production’s creators have skillfully packed a lot of punch into the picture’s economic 1:33:00 runtime, so there’s virtually no wasted footage or extraneous material bogging down the narrative of this tale, which becomes ever-more compelling the further it plays out (though, admittedly, some of the dialogue early on in the film feels a tad cryptic and overwritten, a quality that, thankfully, dissipates quickly). “Black Bag” is another genuinely fine 2025 release, lending more credence to the hope that this could well end up being a better year for movies than its woeful predecessor (not to mention a significant step up for the creative duo of Soderbergh and Koepp compared to their most recent undercooked collaboration, “Presence,” which was released earlier this year). It’s indeed cool to be cool, and this film shows us how that’s done, a fine example that many a filmmaker could learn a lot from.
There’s quite a bit of the John le Carré to this story of duplicity in the intelligence community. “George” (Michael Fassbender) is married to “Kathryn” (Cate Blanchett) and despite the fact that they spend much of their lives keeping secrets from one another (those are the “black bag” conversations that they can’t have) their marriage is really quite strong - much to the envy of many of their colleagues. It’s a dinner with a few of them at their home that starts the cat amongst the pigeons as “George” suspects that one of them is a traitor. He has been given the names of everyone around the table - and that includes his wife! They are an eclectic, aggressive, cheating and back-stabbing bunch and he has his work cut out for him, especially when he begins to suspect the real culprit it just a bit too close to home. Meantime, while he is keeping an eye on here, she is working for boss “Stieglitz” (the unimpressive Pierce Brosnan) and he is also playing games of his own. Who is up to what? Who is pulling whose strings? Well that secret is carefully unravelled over ninety minutes of well crafted spy craft here using a cast that’s well led by Fassbender but that also features a strong contribution from Tom Burke’s frankly rather unlikeable “Freddie” and an enjoyably sophisticated degree of plotting and counter-plotting, scheming and even some fishing! Initially, I feared it might be just a version of “Mr. & Mrs. Smith” but it’s darker and more intriguing than that, with no endless combat scenarios and just an hint of menace.
'Black Bag' is a very good spy thriller! It is a slowburn sorta film and is dialogue heavy, but neither of those things are negatives as long as it delivers - which this 2025 release certainly does. The cast are terrific, most notably Michael Fassbender and Cate Blanchett.
Marisa Abela, Regé-Jean Page, Tom Burke and Naomie Harris are great in their respective parts too. The story kept me interested all the way through, I wouldn't say it's paced to perfection as it felt a little longer than ~1hr 30mins but that's a minor complaint because it's all watchable stuff.
Steven Soderbergh’s “Black Bag” isn’t your typical espionage thriller, but more of a slow-burn character study wrapped in a sleek, stylish spy drama. While it’s well-made and filled with strong performances, it’s also a bit too talky and deliberately paced to be truly gripping. If you’re expecting high-octane action or pulse-pounding twists, you won’t find them here. Instead, Soderbergh delivers a measured, adult-oriented drama that prioritizes emotional depth over spectacle.
The film follows George and Kathryn Woodhouse (Michael Fassbender and Cate Blanchett), both legendary intelligence agents whose marriage is put to the ultimate test when Kathryn becomes a prime suspect in the theft of a top-secret (and highly dangerous) government weapon. Known for his uncanny ability to detect lies, George is assigned to investigate his own wife. This forces him to choose between loyalty to his country or the woman he loves, and it’s going to get messy.
Soderbergh takes a simple premise but develops his characters well. Within minutes, you feel like you know these people, their history, and their unspoken conflicts. The supporting cast of characters add a bit of spicy intrigue to the proceedings, especially as George begins to run his notorious polygraph tests on them one by one. Nothing will prepare you for his more unorthodox methods, which leads to a whole lot of tension and shocking confessions.
Despite great performances, the film’s pacing can drag, and it feels painfully slow at times. While the dialogue is sharp, wickedly written, and delivered with precise doses of scathing, stinging verve, it also feels a little too self-indulgent for the majority of the film’s runtime. This is more of a cerebral drama than a thriller, and it could easily be adapted for the stage given how much of it is driven by conversation rather than action.
Despite it not being the most exciting film, it’s undeniably well-crafted, with strong performances and Soderbergh’s signature sleek style keeping things visually engaging. Unfortunately, he doesn’t seem to know exactly where and how he wants his story to end, which makes the abrupt finale all the more startling.
Personally, I wish I enjoyed “Black Bag” more than I did, but I can’t deny its craftsmanship. It’s an intelligent, well-executed film that respects its audience, even if it doesn’t always thrill them.
By: Louisa Moore / SCREEN ZEALOTS
I was hopeful about this movie given the cast and subject matter. But what looks like a spy thriller with some drama baked in was just that, only it was too arrogant, the dialogue too quippy, and it tried to hammer home that it was smarter than you for the entire movie.
Fassbender played a stiff version of a bureaucratic spy and held his world hostage with his intelligence. But the dialogue, convoluted plot, and lack of any stakes just left this movie flat.
I was thoroughly disappointed with his this played out. 90 minutes with no stakes and just a lot of verbal diarrhea over an object and event that they never gave weight to.
Mauviel was recently featured in Last of Us S02. I kind of want to buy a pan. I'd rather buy a different brand, honestly. Isaac's speach came off forced. Back to the Future 2 did it right.
This is no Back to the Future 2.
They're just a group of friends arguing about Severance. Gun lady is cool. Brosnan sucks. He sucks in Mobland, too. Advertising in the reviews now. Waste of space.
**A Gripping Spy Thriller That Delivers - Though Not My Preferred Genre**
During a critical mission requiring elite skills, agent George uncovers a shocking truth: someone within their organization is leaking secrets to a foreign power. The revelation turns devastating when his wife Catherine's name appears among the prime suspects.
This well-crafted thriller showcases exceptional elements, particularly its powerhouse performances. Cate Blanchett and Michael Fassbender - both operating at the peak of their abilities - deliver absolutely captivating work. Blanchett masterfully balances calm composure with unsettling ambiguity, keeping viewers constantly guessing about her character's loyalty. Fassbender brings his trademark magnetic intensity, dominating every scene with palpable presence.
Their psychological duel - through both nuanced acting and sharp writing - creates genuinely tense, edge-of-your-seat moments. The film smartly utilizes prolonged silences that allow the actors to communicate volumes through subtle expressions, building almost unbearable suspense.
Steven Soderbergh's direction continues his impressive streak, following his recent "Presence" (2025). While framed as a spy thriller, he elevates it into a compelling psychological study. His signature visual style - employing distorted lenses and extreme close-ups - effectively amplifies the ever-present paranoia.
The score deserves special praise for its nerve-jangling precision that enhances every suspenseful moment.
While I must acknowledge "Black Bag" as a quality film with outstanding performances and masterful tension-building, spy thrillers aren't typically my preferred genre. That said, even as someone who doesn't usually gravitate toward these types of films, I can confidently say this is one of the better examples I've seen. It's certainly worth watching for its technical merits and stellar acting, even if the genre itself doesn't completely resonate with my personal tastes.
Steven Soderbergh is a master of efficiency, and BLACK BAG is a testament to that, clocking in at a brisk pace that refuses to waste the audience's time. However, this leanness comes at a cost, often feeling like I was skimming the surface of characters that demanded more depth. That said, it's impossible to look away when Michael Fassbender and Cate Blanchett are on screen; their electric chemistry turns every conversation into a high-stakes duel, anchored by David Koepp's sharp, witty screenplay. Visually, Soderbergh aims for a distinct, hazy aesthetic with heavy bloom effects on light sources. While initially atmospheric, this choice quickly became distracting, blurring the image to a point where the style overwhelmed the substance, making the film feel strangely smudged rather than artistically precise.
The narrative shines brightest during its two dinner party set pieces, which bookend the film with masterful tension and unexpected suspense — these are indisputably the standout filmmaking moments. Outside these domestic pressure cookers, however, the actual espionage plot gets bogged down by a convoluted MacGuffin that becomes increasingly tricky to follow without adding real weight to the stakes. It all builds towards a finale that feels somewhat anti-climactic, lacking the explosive emotional or narrative payoff promised by the tense build-up.
Ultimately, BLACK BAG is a slick, well-acted exercise in paranoia that proves trust is the most dangerous weapon of all, even if the movie itself feels like a minor work from a major director.
Rating: B
